Listen
to our conversation
Left click on the file name to
listen, or right click on the file name to download the podcast.
What
do you think of this podcast? Send us a comment
| The
Wine Industry Tasmania Podcast |
Stuart_Conversation_part1.mp3
(12.5mb
18:16 min duration) |
In
this part of our conversation we hear how Wine Industry Tasmania (WIT)
was formed and why it exists, we discuss how Tassie can emulate NZ and
its marketing prowess and we finish by discussing progress on some
specific issues facing the industry. |
Stuart_conversation_part2.mp3
(8.15mb
11:52 min duration) |
In the second part of our
conversation we
explore the boundary between what WIT does in terms of promotion and
what should be done by the individual vineyards and wineries, we find
out how WIT intends to retain it's membership or even expand it during
these tough economic times. To finish we discuss what the
future
holds for the Tassie wine industry. |
Wine Industry
Tasmania - Tassie
wine's peak body.
Winepunters.com
tries to cover all aspects of the Tasmanian wine industry so
we thought
it was about time to hear a little about how the industry deals with
political, economic and other industry wide issues. This meant going
along to see Stuart Nettlefold - the Executive Officer of Wine Industry
Tasmania (WIT) - and conducting a 'grown up' interview. We
also
wanted to prove to you all that we were capable of more than the usual
unrestrained silliness we display.
Our conversation
with Stuart started with us trying to understand how and when WIT was
formed. WIT was created in late 2006 after the dissolution the
Vineyards Association of Tasmania and reflects the changing nature of
the Tasmanian wine industry. The early emphasis for people
involved in the industry was improving viticultural practices thereby
improving the quality of the fruit. This has certainly been
achieved but at the same time the industry had become larger
and more sophisticated. As a result it faced issues that
could not be
addressed through a volunteer vineyard focused organisation.
WIT differs from the Vineyards Association in that it
has staff as well as volunteers and a board that
includes both wine industry and other business representatives.
At it's
heart WIT is responsible for promoting the Tasmanian
wine industry both
domestically and internationally. Marketing Tassie wine has
become a major focus and it is starting to pay dividends. As
an
example WIT, in
conjunction with the Tasmanian Government, organised a promotional
roadshow event called Tasmania Unbottled which involved taking 28
Tasmanian wine brands to Sydney and
Brisbane to "get people there excited about what is happening down here
with varieties like pinot".
This
is good to hear as the New Zealand wine industry has been doing this
sort of thing for a while and frankly they know a thing
or two about promoting wine. Their success is such that New
Zealand Sauvignon Blanc has
almost become a sub-variety in it's own right. Since Tasmania
and New
Zealand compete head to head on a few cool climate wine varieties
we were keen to get Stuart's opinion on the New Zealand
marketing machine and what Tassie needs to do to match the popularity
of New Zealand wine.
In
response Stuart mentioned a range of sensible steps like more roadshows
and targeting the 'right' wine shows to win medals and gain additional
recognition but our favourite was "continually wooing wine writers".
Being a kind of wine writer ourselves we were in furious
agreement and look forward to being
"wooed" especially
if this involves the provision of free wine or all expenses paid trips (oops, looks like we revealed our
cunning and formerly secret plan- Ed).
Actually
the conversation about New Zealand went on for a while and we were
particularly keen to learn if Tassie understood why and how New Zealand
have been able to succeed so well in marketing their country as well as
their produce. In Stuart's opinion behind all the slick
marketing
it is the focus on quality that has driven New Zealand's success and he
believes that Tasmania must follow suit.
The focus on marketing
and the active lobbying of government were the sort of things we
expected to hear from Stuart but what surprised us was the emphasis WIT
places on research. Stuart
is keen on using research to not only improve the quality of
Tassie wine but also build expertise. He is proud of the fact
that a research consortium has been formed to look into improving
viticulture associated with pinot and sparkling wine varieties.
His goal is to set up a cool climate research institute in
Tasmania in the future.
Moving on we wanted to explore some specific issues that
effect or are being dealt with by WIT.
Tasmania is sometimes too famous for its parochial nature (we have been on the receiving end of it!
- Ed)
and we were curious whether Stuart had noticed it in the wine industry.
He agreed that it can happen but said that currently the
emphasis
was on the Tasmanian wine brand as a whole. However in the
future
this may change so that the individual regions (for example the Coal
River valley or Tamar valley) become more prominent.
Part of the
price of a bottle of wine comes from the imposition of the Wine
Equalisation Tax (WET) which is designed to make sure that wine is not
too cheap because oh my god people might actually drink less beer and
bingo bango Australia becomes a smoking ruin and the laughing stock of
the world (is that a
rant, it looks like a rant, yep it's a rant - Ed).
We have become aware that the social improvers in
the
Federal Government want to make us drink less overall and so are
thinking about changing the WET so it applies on a volume basis.
As
Stuart points out this would significantly disadvantage some smaller
wine producers and WIT along with the rest of the wine
industry
has been trying to point this fact out to our parliamentarians.
The issue has gone quiet of late probably due to the
impact of
the global financial crisis. Lets hope the gaze of the social
improvers goes onto, and stays with, people who really need help.
Our
last issue touches on the use of chemicals in the industry and the
changes to regulations covering how, when and where vineyard owners can
spray. Urban sprawl has meant that some vineyards, Moorilla
and
Darlington spring immediately to mind, are located in or near suburbs.
The State Government has proposed changes to regulations
covering
chemical spraying that could prevent some vineyard owners from using
any chemical sprays.
WIT has made representations to the
Government on this issue and hopefully a position can be reached that
addresses any real health issues such spraying may raise without
forcing vineyards to close. Stuart is expecting to hear more
on
this issue later in the year.
Given the prominence of the global financial crisis we
wanted to
explore how WIT operates in a deteriorating economic environment.
To
start with we wondered where WIT's marketing efforts ended and those of
the individual vineyard or winery began. Stuart pointed out
that
WIT operates at the state level and produces overall marketing products
like the State Wine Brochure but that specific marketing of an
individual brand rests with that business.
We
then wanted to know how WIT maintains its membership and remains
relevant as producers are forced to examine all their expenditure more
closely. Stuart is already dealing with this issue and is well aware of
the difficulty his organisation faces. As Stuart said "if you
put
your fees up too far some members will not renew ... yet you have to
remain financially viable". According to Stuart the best hope
WIT
has in the future is to deliver against its strategic plan and this
will demonstrate to its members and other industry participants that
WIT continues to be a necessary part of the industry.
Since we thought Stuart was in a great position to talk
about it we
wanted to know what he saw as the opportunities and challenges that lay
ahead for the Tassie wine industry. He talked about the aspects of the
industry that he believes will help to secure its future.
Stuart
argued that Tasmania has to continue to build on its current emphasis
on quality by positioning itself as a 'super premium' cool climate
producer.
In addition he stated that the planned research projects
will deliver real benefits in the future. To help ensure this
WIT
has planned an event to present the findings of the current $1.8
million research project around pinot and sparkling wine. This
presentation will take place in 2011 and will be part of a wider cool
climate conference with participants from all regions
throughout
the world. The intention is to also incorporate a major food
and
arts festival to widen it's appeal and impact.
While
it meant finishing the conversation on a sombre note we did
want Stuart to discuss the major threats to the industry in
the
future. Naturally he identified the next 12 months as shaping up to be
particularly difficult. Stuart stated that so far
the
traditional on-premise market isn't hurting too bad but the
expectation is that we will see a down turn in the restaurant trade in
the new year (2009). Given the emphasis that many Tassie wine
producers place on this trade, this could cause real problems for them.
The
other area being watched closely is tourism. So far tourist numbers
have held up reasonably well particularly compared with areas such as
far north Queensland (the
interview happened prior to their recent floods - Ed).
However the impact of current events, whether positive or negative,
won't really be apparent until April this year which is the traditional
start of the quiet season in Tasmania.
As always we have
enjoyed another conversation about wine and the industry. We continue
to be impressed with the people we meet and Stuart was no
exception. We also hope that the combination of this article and the
podcast of our conversation with Stuart was both interesting,
educational and proved our credentials in the 'grown up interviewing'
caper.
What
do you think? Send us a comment